{"id":4619,"date":"2025-08-20T11:51:32","date_gmt":"2025-08-20T14:51:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gboetrack.com\/?p=4619"},"modified":"2025-08-28T10:48:43","modified_gmt":"2025-08-28T13:48:43","slug":"do-registro-ao-resultado-a-jornada-da-amostra-parte-3-triagem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gboetrack.com\/en\/do-registro-ao-resultado-a-jornada-da-amostra-parte-3-triagem\/","title":{"rendered":"From Record to Result: The Sample Journey \u2013 Part 3 \u2013 Screening"},"content":{"rendered":"

Triagem Sob Press\u00e3o: Quando o Preparo Paralisa o Fluxo<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Do-Registro-ao-Resultado-A-Jornada-da-Amostra-parte-3\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The invisible bottleneck before analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In many laboratories, triage has become the bottleneck of pre-analytical processes. Samples pile up on benches, with no clear prioritization criteria, while staff desperately try to reorganize spreadsheets and understand which tests are urgent and which can wait. This pre-analytical chaos not only delays results but also impacts the entire analytical workflow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are the main pains during screening?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Lack of objective priority criteria<\/strong>
    Without clear rules (clinical urgency, type of test, arrival time), triage becomes a matter of guesswork, increasing the waiting time for critical samples.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Confusing listings in old systems or spreadsheets<\/strong>
    Outdated interfaces and extensive tables make it difficult to quickly see what needs to be processed first.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Constant rework to reorder queues<\/strong>
    Last-minute changes or emergency orders force the team to manually reorganize priorities, generating errors and burnout.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    What are the operational repercussions of the sorting bottleneck?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n